For Pavesi, setting a crime novel in the recent past gives his books certain advantages. Reflecting on why he set Ink Ribbon Red in 1999, he remarked, “With this particular book because there is this persistent question over what is real and what is not, I wanted to aid the writing of that by having the whole book feel slightly unreal, slightly dreamlike and I felt like it achieved that more successfully if I set the book in the past because for me… the past always feels slightly less real than the present. Thinking back to the 90’s when the book is set, you look at things like pay phones and… often with crime novels you have this problem with things like mobile phones interfering with plot… so what I ended up doing was setting it in the most recent past I could think of that would still count as definitively the past, so I settled on 1999 as being symbolic of that because it was the last millennium…”

My book is kind of structured like a jigsaw puzzle where you have these short chapters. Part of the puzzle is putting them in order, but also some of the pieces are not actually parts of the final puzzle. These are the stories the characters have written for their game.”


Most detective story readers are an educated audience and know there are only a certain number of plots. The interest lies in what the writer does with them.”
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!