Running through it all is the story off a boy who grew up steeped in religion, and became a man who loved science, and sees the good in both. If all scientists were as good at storytelling (i.e. conveying scientific principles in an accessible way) as David Parrish, I think we might see a lot less anti-science bias in our public discourse today,
The insight that really sticks with me is the idea that the scientific method can’t actually “prove” a definite cause for an observed phenomenon – it can eliminate hypotheses, or demonstrate that a hypothesis is true under the experimental circumstances, but that is never enough to prove that the matter is settled. True scientists know this, and in a strange way it makes me trust science more.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8da8/f8da844b71238cf964b46718d8f0f1de2b8cb341" alt=""
I call this book my love song to biology
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c67/a1c6795f0c2a4d0f2a796c7e8369e638b57a44a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c6b4/5c6b46680a51c25fface45a845bd04849f1e953b" alt=""
It is utterly false and cruelly arbitrary to put all the play and learning into childhood, all the work into middle age, and all the regrets into old age.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff8a6/ff8a6e466d67f13b4ecf4ab934cbe0006f9d37c8" alt=""
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!