One of the chapters that Boyers includes in his book is about a time, back in 1990, when Steiner invited him to attend one of his classes on Shakespeare at the University of Geneva. These classes were given about once a week in a large auditorium and focused on one Shakespeare play each semester. Boyers recalls, “…in that auditorium, many, many, many hundreds of people were present, only a small number of them were students at the University of Geneva. Most of the people there were people who traveled to Geneva each week to attend George Steiner’s Shakespeare class. Many of them were middle-aged or older business people, stockbrokers, doctors, lawyers, politicians, and they were coming in on trains and planes from different places in Europe to attend this class. Many of them that I had met had been attending it for 10 years already and they hoped to go through all 37 Shakespeare plays with George Steiner. He was just regarded as the Great Maestro and he was always interesting, scrupulous at going through the text. Can you imagine an entire semester devoted to one play? Very close reading and that seemed to all of these people… completely thrilling, and Steiner seemed the perfect teacher… I just thought George had grown tremendously as a teacher and, in many ways, as a human being in the 25 years between the time he was my teacher in graduate school and the time I saw him do this class, and I just felt I had to include that chapter in the book.”
As for the reason why Steiner and Sontag may have had such an intense dislike for one another, Boyers speculated that it may have been due to their competitive natures. He remarked, “They were in their ways, I think, very competitive with one another. They often wrote about the same things almost at the same time… there were parallels of that sort all through their careers in spite of the fact that they were also very different, and had in some cases, [had] very different interests… They were different, they weren’t the same, but nevertheless, they were highly competitive and they were certainly, for a period of about 30 or 40 years, they were two of the most prominent writer intellectuals in the world. They had a following, both of them, that was quite enormous and this was easily measurable. When either one of them gave a public lecture, a vast audience would arrive to be there and their books sold large numbers of copies… They really were similar in certain ways, profoundly different in other ways, and always very competitive.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8da8/f8da844b71238cf964b46718d8f0f1de2b8cb341" alt=""
Both of them had the capacity to write not just for scholars and intellectuals, but to write for everybody, and that’s a fantastic gift.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04b55/04b558475dc49e00ba4385d64700376f320fb5c7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c6b4/5c6b46680a51c25fface45a845bd04849f1e953b" alt=""
Relationships should make us feel better. Why else bother? But there are different ways of feeling better.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40e7c/40e7c17090f34605ea6c7ebd70cf8c400f8ef607" alt=""
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
I was one of those poets blessed to
have been awakened into
confessional poetry by
Robert Boyers:
Tender.Brilliant. Nurturing.
“On Losing Jess”
By Nancy Crawley Studebaker
B A English Literature
Skidmore College ‘73
“It hurts to put the sun away,
And bring out clothes for colder day…”
Beginning line to my poem on
losing a former student.
Professor Boyers led the way.